Comments on: New models, fewer megapixels? http://www.snappertalk.com/index.php/20090819/new-models-fewer-megapixels/ Blog of photojournalist Ben Curtis Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:07:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Ben http://www.snappertalk.com/index.php/20090819/new-models-fewer-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-26876 Ben Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:40:26 +0000 http://www.snappertalk.com/?p=734#comment-26876 It's not generally advertised because most consumers only think about the megapixels. But if you look at a site like Digital Photography Review - http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp - they list the sensor size, and more usefully the pixel pitch (i.e. size of each pixel). It’s not generally advertised because most consumers only think about the megapixels. But if you look at a site like Digital Photography Review – http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp – they list the sensor size, and more usefully the pixel pitch (i.e. size of each pixel).

]]> By: Bulletproof Vests http://www.snappertalk.com/index.php/20090819/new-models-fewer-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-26875 Bulletproof Vests Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:30:57 +0000 http://www.snappertalk.com/?p=734#comment-26875 Why isnt the sensor size advertised as a specification for consumers if it is the most important factor in picture clarity? Why isnt the sensor size advertised as a specification for consumers if it is the most important factor in picture clarity?

]]> By: MB http://www.snappertalk.com/index.php/20090819/new-models-fewer-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-26816 MB Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:49:00 +0000 http://www.snappertalk.com/?p=734#comment-26816 Ooh, I'd missed that S90 announcement. Quite liked my old S50, and I'd just started thinking about picking up a new small form factor camera . . . thanks! Ooh, I’d missed that S90 announcement. Quite liked my old S50, and I’d just started thinking about picking up a new small form factor camera . . .

thanks!

]]>